News reports in Singapore can be so amusing... Or maybe it is just me. I was checking out The Straits Times Online, getting myself updated about the latest 'news' about the escape of Mas Selamat Kastari, the limping only when running terrorist, and I find myself being highly amused by what I was reading. Here are some excerpt from the article I just finished amusing myself with plus my opinions. All excerpts are from the article, Two Separate Probes into Terrorist's Escape and Police Believe: He Acted Alone; He is Still in Singapore, both dated 3rd of March.
"Mr Wong said security at Whitley Road Detention Centre, which is under the charge of the Internal Security Department, has been stepped up, and the 'physical breach' in the centre's compound plugged.
He declined to give details, saying: 'You will know that later on.'"
Later on huh, Mr. Wong. The thing is, will we ever know? Sure it has been revealed that there was a 'physical breach', but what sort of an information could that be? Do you mean that the bricks moved by themselves or the window (which I doubt will be bigger than my 17 inch monitor) enlarged itself by Mas Selamat's commands? So we have no information because the Home Affairs department chose to keep things partially confidential. That is the problem you see Mr. Wong. When you choose to tease our minds like that and discourage us from speculating, you are actually tickling our creative juices and all the strangest and wildest speculations start coming out. My advise is that if there is nothing to tell, don't say anything at all but if there is really something to tell, tell all or at least most. My guess is there is nothing much to tell and the repetitive 'physical breach' was just something to occupy our curious and wondering minds with. Comeon, we are not fools. Your non-commital way of saying things do pisses some of us off, if not all.
"POLICE believe terrorist Mas Selamat Kastari acted alone when he escaped from the Whitley Road Detention Centre last Wednesday."
Police. Now on what basis do they come to this belief? Or is this being repeated time and again in various reports to aid us sub consciously to believe that he acted alone and none of the members in our security forces rendered him assistance for probable self gain? Now check out the next sentence.
"Without help, he would have found it hard to get out of Singapore, especially with the security dragnet in place since his breakout."
Now let us change this to "Without help, he would have found it hard to get out of a heavily guarded detention centre." Enough said?
"Police Assistant Commissioner Wong Hong Kuan said yesterday: 'We believe he was unaided, and therefore he does not have access to money, vehicles, or modes of transport."
Okay, they believe but how sure can they be? I mean, I am sure that he is not that daft to escape knowing that he has nothing or nobody at all to count on outside the toilet walls and fences of the detention centre. Right, so this is what they believe... quite typical really.
"As the search for Mas Selamat entered Day Five, the police gave more details to help the public identify him.
AC Wong, the director of operations, clarified that the fugitive's limp in his left leg is evident only when he walks briskly or runs. Otherwise, he appears to have a normal gait."
That is all. Do we deserve more information? We do. I wonder how much they observe him going about daily in the detention centre. If they had been more observant, they could have given us the information right from the very beginning instead of now, after reviewing the videos of him going about, walking normally around the place. Perhaps the lack of observation have partly aided in his escape. Who knows? 
Actually if you really notice, he has a very common face. If we are to depend on the descriptions given to us by the police, then I guess that when we see someone who looks like the one in the picture(s) released, then maybe we should try to give the fella a chase to see if he limps when he runs. Idea? IDEA!
"'But I believe our reputation continues to remain high compared to many other countries and we will do everything possible to ensure that this does not happen again,' he added."
Very optimistic. I am sure some of our neighbours will forgive us if a limping terrorist who escaped from a heavily guarded detention centre via the toilet if he gave them a BOMBastic issue to think about. However I like the optimism really. Some of my foreign friends (here and abroad) have been asking if this could well be a joke. They still couldn't believe it. Actually neither can I. Somewhat too ridiculous maybe.
"He felt that life should go on, and how Singaporeans respond now is a test of their resilience. 'Let us not be cowed by this,' he said."
Yes life goes on. Pay your taxes regularly but keep your eyes wide open for the man in the poster.
I do want to see him caught and I do want to be informed about what happened exactly. However I have a feeling that we may not know at all, even though he might eventually be 'caught'. This is probably all a wayang show for you and I. However that is merely speculation as my creative juices tend to go wild when teased as I have a (skeptical) brain that never stops thinking of possibilities.
The police and government are telling us nothing really even though they think they are by occupying us with interesting phrases, vague descriptions and non-commital statements and such.
